Monday, September 06, 2021

Eternity in the Human Heart

I feel almost guilty picking up just one verse out of such rich texts and using it as a springboard for what Neil and I will say. Ecclesiastes 3 is perhaps the best-known chapter of that enigmatic book, and the beginning of this chapter has been immortalized by the Byrds (among others) singing, “To everything – turn, turn, turn …” I wish that we could reflect on what the editor of Ecclesiastes is saying by quoting this extended message from Qoholeth (“the teacher”), but we just don’t have time. 
 
Similarly, Romans 2 is part of a remarkable argument in which Paul develops the insight that God has come to all people throughout the world, bringing grace and truth to set us free from the power of sin. Probing that argument also must wait for some other day. Today we focus just on this one verse from Ecclesiastes: “God has set eternity in the human heart.” 
 
Eternity in their Hearts 
What does Ecclesiastes mean by this phrase, “Eternity in their hearts”? We live in time, moment by moment. The natural world around us moves through the seasons of the year and the seasons of our lives, past, present, and future. “Eternity” is a concept almost beyond our imagination. Eternity is where God is. Eternity is what God lives in. A basic Jewish prayer refers to God as “Melech ha olam” – the king of Eternity (or king of the universe, or eternal king). 
 
The NRSV takes this phrase, “eternity in their hearts”, to mean God “has put a sense of past and future into their minds”. This is an effort to find a meaning that fits the outlook of Qoholeth in the rest of the book, but it runs against the sense of the words. Most other translations keep the idea of “eternity in their hearts”. 
 
It’s a difficult verse: “He has also set eternity in the human heart; yet no one can fathom what God has done from beginning to end.” Here’s what I think it means. God has placed something of God’s own self in every human heart and every human culture, but we are not able to see God clearly or understand what God is doing in our world. 
 
That second step is where the gospel comes in. We know something of God, but God remains hidden from us. Then Jesus comes, preaching the Gospel of God’s Reign. Jesus comes, showing what God looks like. Jesus comes, opening our eyes to God’s presence already with us. 
 
Don Richardson 
Don Richardson was a Canadian missionary who went to West Papua, part of Indonesia in 1962. At that time, it was called Dutch New Guinea. He and his wife and their seven-month old baby went to a group of people known as the Sawi and began to learn their language. This was a first contact situation: Neither group knew anything about the other when they began their relationship. 
 
The Sawi lived in the jungle, separated from other people by their geographical isolation and by the fierceness of their culture. They especially valued people who could appear to be your friend, but then at the crucial moment could turn and betray you. So when Don and Carol told them the stories of Jesus, they laughed at Jesus. They thought that Judas was the hero and Jesus was just a fool. 
 
So difficult did the Richardsons' life become in the jungle village that they decided to pull out and leave. The villagers were engaged in constant fights with a neighbouring village. Life was hard and dangerous. And worst of all, they thought Judas was the hero of the story. 
 
Then Don and Carol told them that they were leaving. The villagers were upset. They valued these outsiders and wanted them to stay. The Richardsons said they could not stay in such constant fighting and warfare. Finally, the villagers called a meeting with their fiercest enemies from the neighbouring village. Someone from one village picked up his son and ran to his enemies. He gave them his son and ran back to his side, while his son was taken in to his enemies. Richardson asked what had happened, and they told him. 
 
The boy was a peace child, they said. As long as the child lived, the two villages would be at peace. “But what if someone betrays him?” “That person would be cursed. No one dare betray the peace child.” 
 
Even in their culture, “eternity” – a revelation of God’s presence was already there. Don and Carol told them that Jesus was the peace child, and the people saw the truth. Judas was no longer the hero; Jesus was. They turned to Christ in remarkable numbers and embraced the fuller revelation of God in Christ. 
 
Transition 
This is an extreme example, but it is not as unusual as you might think. In his book, Eternity in their Hearts, Richardson tells many more such stories. God never waits for the missionaries to show up, because God is a missionary God. Wherever people are, God is there, reaching out to them to heal our brokenness and bring us back to God. 
 
I think Richardson is right – that God has placed bits of the gospel in every culture – and so I assume that First Nations cultures also show evidence of the gospel, present in their culture long before White settlers came to North America. God has always been here, and we can learn about God from those who lived here before we did, even as we tell them the stories of Jesus. 
 
Neil, can you pick up from this point and give us some idea of how God was already here before the explicit preaching of the gospel?
 
At this point, Neil and Edith von Gunten, our guests for the morning, took over with the teaching of the tipi, from the Ojibwe First Nations people. I cannot replicate their presentation; I don't know enough. But they made the point effectively, showing how their hosts had taught them about God and God's relationship with us as they lived among First Nations in Canada. 
 
Steinbach Mennonite Church 
5 September 2021

Saturday, August 28, 2021

Vignettes: Walls and Shenk

In my last blog, I paid a brief tribute to Andrew Walls and Wilbert Shenk. I did not know either man well. Wilbert knew me, but I doubt that Andrew Walls remembered me from our brief meeting. Still, I have my own memories of these two men, whom I have called "heroes" in the world of missiology.

I remember meeting Shenk at the Associated Mennonite Biblical Seminaries (now Anabaptist Mennonite Biblical Seminary -- AMBS) in Elkhart, Indiana. I was looking for missions courses to teach, and he was the missiology professor at AMBS. He was engaged in a research project analysing secular culture, which meant that he needed someone to teach his regular missions course.

He invited me to teach that course, which became my first step into the world of teaching missions. I also taught a world religions course at Huntington College at that time. The college course was rocky and could have ended my foray into teaching; the seminary course was wonderful and confirmed my calling to teach at this level.

I remember the end of our initial conversation together. Wilbert said something like, "It has been wonderful to talk to someone who speaks my language." He spent his time with colleagues who spoke a closely related academic language, but as missiologists we shared a common understanding that he found nourishing. As did I.

A few years later, we were at a meeting of the American Society of Missiology together. I was teaching a missions history course and had trouble finding a good source to recount the cross-cultural witness of mainline churches. As we went in to lunch, I asked Wilbert if he could recommend a good source on mainline missions history. He replied curtly, "There is none." He meant, of course, that churches who saw missionary outreach as illegitimate did not have much outreach to describe. Evangelicals in the USA have many problems -- especially with what is sometimes called civil religion -- but they do at least witness to the gospel of Jesus Christ wherever they go.

One brief story about Andrew Walls, which I have told before. When Wilbert retired from teaching at Fuller's school of world mission (where he had gone from AMBS), he returned to Elkhart, where he lived his last years. The Anabaptist Association of Missiologists (I think) held a dinner with several speeches in his honour. The keynote address came after the evening meal and was delivered by Walls, who had been Wilbert's mentor in his doctoral studies.

We were in the Chapel of the Sermon on the Mount.and the lighting was dim. Walls could not read his manuscript as he stood at the podium, so someone went to get a lamp they could place over the podium. While we waited, Walls spoke briefly with us. He said something like this: "People have told me that I am a dry speaker, and I believe that it is true. But I must tell you that I have only fallen asleep once while lecturing, and in my defense, I was the last to go." He spoke the truth -- he was a dry speaker, but his insights were and are powerful and continuing. I am greatly in his debt, as well as in Wilbert's debt. 

I did not know them well, but I miss them and thank our common Creator for giving us the privilege of knowing them.

Monday, August 23, 2021

Walls and Shenk

 Over the past few weeks, two of my missiological heroes have died.

Andrew Walls wrote several texts that I use regularly in my teaching. He developed the idea, for example, of Christianity as growing through serial expansion and Islam growing through progressive expansion (see the second essay in The Cross-Cultural Process in Christian History). Christianity has moved around the world throughout its history, so that some one-time centres of Christian faith have become thoroughly de-Christianized. In contrast, Islam tends to take territory and hold it.

This insight rests on the fragility of the cross (as Walls terms it) and reminds us of the necessity of choice. As someone else has said, "The church is always one generation away from extinction."

The serial nature of the church also leads to a remarkably diverse and rich history, described in the first essay of The Missionary Movement in Christian History. Walls describes five centres of the faith down through the centuries -- from Jerusalem to Southern Europe (home to Greek  culture) to Ireland to England to Nigeria. The serial nature of the church also helps us to see the richness of the Persian and Eastern Church, so often ignored in the study of Christian history.

A final contribution (although I could name many more) from Walls' essays: He describes the indigenous principle and the pilgrim principle of being the church. The church and Christian faith are at home in every culture and in no culture. Our final home is with God; yet we are at home here in every culture. These two principles held in tension protect us from civil religion and imperialism on the one hand and from sectarian irrelevancy on the other.

I mentioned also Wilbert Shenk. Walls and Shenk knew each other well. Walls was Shenk's advisor in his doctoral studies, and together they edited a seminal book on "new religious movements", Exploring New Religious Movements: Essays in Honour of Harold W. Turner. (A harder book to find!) Which brings me to remember Shenk.

Wilbert Shenk was a leading Mennonite missiologist. When he taught at AMBS, he gave me my first experience teaching missions courses. He was involved in a Pew Grant-funded study of contemporary culture, which led to a series title "Christian Mission and Modern Culture". (I have used several of the resulting volumes in my own work.)

That experience at AMBS was my first step in teaching missions at Providence Theological Seminary (Manitoba) for the past 25 years. I am indebted to Shenk for his invitation and I learned much from him in our contacts over the years.

They are both gone now, and I am semi-retired. The faith in which they lived their lives sustains me, and the hope with which they lived has become sight and pure fact.

Sunday, July 25, 2021

The Ultimate Intimate (Telling God's Story: New Testament)

25 July 2021
Steinbach Mennonite Church

Last Sunday, Michael Pahl introduced us to the section in the hymnal on God’s Story as it draws from the Old Testament. Today, we continue with the New Testament. This section in the hymnal is really big, covering everything from Advent to the Reign of Christ. There are more than 200 entries included in this section.

I have chosen two basic passages to encompass these varied themes. The first is found in the beginning of Luke’s gospel and emphasises the simple historical nature of the accounts we have in the New Testament. The second is found at the end of Revelation and emphasises the cosmic nature of the story that we find ourselves in. We look briefly at these two passages and then return to this remarkable combination of daily life and cosmic significance.

Luke 1: 1-4, 2: 1-7
The first two chapters of Luke’s gospel make two simple points besides telling the amazing and wonderful story of Jesus’ birth. 1) Luke writes his gospel in order to establish the simple historical truth of the life of Jesus. 2) He locates the story of Jesus’ birth in sober matter-of-fact terms: when and where. God’s story in the OT begins with the cosmos – “far beyond the starry skies”. In the NT the story is anchored in history. God’s story is the story of God’s intervention in human history. “God is here among us, let us all adore him.”

Luke 1: 1 to 4 states it clearly. Luke says that there are many stories circulating about Jesus and that there are also many who actually knew Jesus and heard him teach. Luke says, “I too decided, after investigating everything carefully from the very first, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, so that you may know the truth concerning the things about which you have been instructed.” Luke grounds the amazing story of Jesus in sober historical fact.

Luke 2: 1-7 demonstrates that grounding:
In those days a decree went out from Emperor Augustus that all the world should be registered. 2 This was the first registration and was taken while Quirinius was governor of Syria. 3 All went to their own towns to be registered. 4 Joseph also went from the town of Nazareth in Galilee to Judea, to the city of David called Bethlehem, because he was descended from the house and family of David. 5 He went to be registered with Mary, to whom he was engaged and who was expecting a child. 6 While they were there, the time came for her to deliver her child. 7 And she gave birth to her firstborn son and wrapped him in bands of cloth, and laid him in a manger, because there was no place for them in the inn.

Luke writes with the kind of attention to detail that you might find in a good journalist, one who takes care to verify everything and gets all the facts straight. This careful attention to historical fact is a basic characteristic of the story of God. Most religions are not grounded in history. They seek to show the cosmic story, not the simpler human story. The way that the New Testament story begins with attention to human history is important.

Why do you think it is important? Other religions (like Hinduism and Buddhism and Islam) do not ground themselves in history in this way. We do, but why? Because the story of Jesus brings God directly into our lives. Jesus was a man like us. He was a Palestinian Jew who lived in the first century. He was probably average height for his time – about 5 ft 3 in, with short hair. The people around him knew him and his family. The importance of all this simple historical detail is to emphasize the reality of “God with us”.

Revelation 21 and 22
This emphasis on the particular specific reality of Jesus brings us to the end of the story in Revelation. The book of Revelation in general is anything but commonplace. John does not make it easy for us to see his historical context. Instead, he focusses on the cosmic reality of Christ. He brings the whole grand story of God’s redemption of the world to a soaring climax in which Jesus, the man of Galilee, is revealed as Christ, the ruler of the Universe.

We read part of chapter 21 and part of chapter 22, but we could have read both together. The end of chapter 21 describes Jesus this way: “I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb. And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine on it, for the glory of God is its light, and its lamp is the Lamb.” In the New Heaven and New Earth, the sun is eclipsed by the glory of “the Lamb”, that is, Jesus, the Son of God.

Chapter 22 repeats this description: “Nothing accursed will be found there anymore. But the throne of God and of the Lamb will be in it, and his servants will worship him; they will see his face, and his name will be on their foreheads. And there will be no more night; they need no light of lamp or sun, for the Lord God will be their light, and they will reign forever and ever.”

The descriptions of the New Jerusalem include various ways of describing perfection. There is no more sorrow. Tears are gone. Death is done away with. There is no more sea. This last one is interesting: In the Old Testament, the Sea is the place that evil rises from, and in the earlier chapters of Revelation the Beast comes from the Sea. Now, not only is evil defeated, but the very place that agents of evil have hidden themselves is destroyed. Everything is now right; perfection rules forever!

Synthesis
Bring these two pictures together. In the first picture, Jesus comes as a baby who grows into adulthood and lives an ordinary life on earth. He gets caught up in the intrigues and power plays of the day and loses his life to a Roman cross. In the second picture, Jesus reveals God in all God’s glory, and the physical weakness that we see in Jesus reveals the power and eternal glory of God, the Creator.

In my seminary studies, my world religions professor (Matt Zahniser) expressed this dual dynamic in an interesting way. He observed that some religions view God as ultimate and other than us. Typical are Judaism and Islam, in which God created all that is. God is not present in this world physically; rather, God made this world, and we live in it and do God’s will. God is ultimate. God is sovereign. As Judaism puts it, God is “King of Eternity”, and as Islam puts it, God is the only One, the absolute Other, the Creator of the universe.

Zahniser continued with the opposite end of the spectrum: Some religions view God as intimate and closer to us than our own skin. Hinduism is typical of this view. Hindu teachers tell us that you and I are God. We are all one and the differences that we see in this world are really only an illusion. If God is not just within me, but actually is me, then God is more intimate than we can possibly imagine.

Both of these views have their attraction. If God is ultimate, God has the power to deal with all of the problems of our world. Of course, if God is ultimate, God may not be particularly interested in our problems. If God is intimate, God cares about us intimately. Of course, if God is intimate, God may not have the power to deal with our problems. We need a God of power and a God of intimate love. That is what we find in Christian faith.

In Christian faith we have a God who is ultimate. Just as in Judaism and Islam, God is the creator of the universe. The passage Michael Pahl led us in last Sunday states it clearly: “Have you not known? Have you not heard? The Lord is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He does not faint or grow weary; his understanding is unsearchable.” (Isaiah 40:28)

We also have a God who is intimate. Just as in Hinduism, God is closer to us than anything else in the world. That is why one of the names of Jesus is Immanuel, “God with us.” That is why Jesus was born as a baby into a human family. Indeed, you could call Jesus “the Ultimate Intimate”.

The Ultimate Intimate – that is the story of the New Testament. God who is ultimate, who holds the moon and the stars in God’s hand, that ultimate omnipotent God came into our lives as one of us. Or to put it the other way round, Jesus, the intimate one, Jesus who walked with his disciples and ate and slept with them, this closer than a brother Jesus is also the ultimate, the Creator of all that is or ever can be. Jesus is the Ultimate Intimate.

Singing The Story
We sing this amazing NT story each Sunday to remind ourselves that this is the world that we live in. Our world often appears to be a collection of random events with no real hope for the future. We sing the story to remind ourselves that the one who made our world lives and walks among us as one of us. We sing the story to rediscover God’s presence in our hurt and fears.

These two themes – God’s closeness and love for us on the one hand and God’s power to save us on the other – intertwine to give us hope in a hopeless world. Here are two new songs in this section of the hymnal that express this hope.

#303
O love, how deep, how broad, how high!/ It fills the heart with ecstasy,
That God, the Son of God, should take/ our mortal form for mortals’ sake.

For us he was baptized and bore/ his holy fast, and hungered sore.
For us temptation sharp he knew,/ for us the tempter overthrew.

For us he prayed, for us he taught,/ for us his daily works he wrought,
By words and signs and actions thus/ still seeking not himself but us.

For us to wicked hands betrayed,/ scourged, mocked, in purple robe arrayed,
He bore the shameful cross and death, for us at length gave up his breath.

Eternal glory to our God/ for love so deep, so high, so broad;/
The Trinity whom we adore forever and forever more.
 
Another hymn, sung to the tune of  Star of the County Down (sung by the Irish Rovers).
#412
My soul cries out with a joyful shout that the God of my heart is great
And my spirit sings of the wondrous things that you bring to the ones who wait
You fixed your sight on your servant’s plight and my weakness you did not spurn
So from east to west shall my name be blest/ Could the world be about to turn?

My heart shall sing of the day you bring/ Let the fires of your justice burn
Wipe away all tears/ For the dawn draws near/ And the world is about to turn!

Though I am small, my God, my all, you work great things in me
And your mercy will last from the Depths of the past to the end of the age to be
Your very name puts the proud to shame and to those who would for you yearn
You will show your might, put the strong to flight/ For the world is about to turn

My heart shall sing of the day you bring/ Let the fires of your justice burn
Wipe away all tears/ For the dawn draws near/ And the world is about to turn!

From the halls of power to the fortress tower not a stone will be left on stone
Let the king beware for your justice tears ev’ry tyrant from his throne
The hungry poor shall weep no more for the food they can never earn
There are tables spread, ev’ry mouth be fed/ For the world is about to turn

My heart shall sing of the day you bring/ Let the fires of your justice burn
Wipe away all tears/ For the dawn draws near/ And the world is about to turn!

Though the nations rage from age to age we remember Who holds us fast
God’s mercy must deliver us from the conqueror’s crushing grasp
This saving word that out forebears heard is the promise which holds us bound
’Til the spear and rod can be crushed by God Who is turning the world around

My heart shall sing of the day you bring/ Let the fires of your justice burn
Wipe away all tears/ For the dawn draws near/ And the world is about to turn!

Conclusion
I encourage you to look through this wonderful section on the life, death, resurrection, return, and reign of Jesus. There is power in this story – the power of the Ultimate Almighty God. There is love and hope in this story – the love of the Intimate God who loves us so much that God became one of us. The power of love expressed in the Ultimate Intimate, God with us, our Immanuel.

Texts
Luke 1: 1-4: 2: 1-7
1) Luke writes his gospel in order to establish the simple historical truth of the life of Jesus. 2) He locates the story of Jesus’ birth in sober matter-of-fact terms: when and where. God’s story in the OT begins with the cosmos – “far beyond the starry skies”. In the NT the story is anchored in history. God’s story is the story of God’s intervention in human history. “God is here among us, let us all adore him.”
 
Revelation 21: 1-4; 22: 1-6
God’s story in the NT begins in Bethlehem, but it ends in the New Jerusalem. From sober history to something beyond human imagining, “fantasy” of the highest order. The end of the story really is better than anything we could possibly think of ourselves, and it is given to us!

Focus Statement: God’s NT story begins in our lives and ends in God. The OT sets the stage for us to analyse the ills and troubles of this world; the NT brings hope into the darkest places of our lives.

Think on it questions: What is the New Testament story for? Isn’t the Old Testament enough? Why do we need “God’s Story, Part Two”?

Sunday, July 18, 2021

Building God’s House

A word about how I go about preparing sermons. I prefer to preach from a specific text than on a specific theme. I have my favourite themes of course, and the theme that emerges from today’s texts is one of them. It is, therefore, all the more important that I begin with Scripture. I use a lectionary that Lee Hiebert, our senior pastor at SMC, uses, and it gives us the two passages I work with this morning. 

My basic process is to consider each passage of Scripture, and then to search for common themes, which form the basis of the sermon. We begin then with 2 Samuel 7, proceed to Ephesians 2, and then seek a synthesis. The lectionary also adds Mark 6, but I have omitted the gospel reading from this morning’s texts. 
 
2 Samuel 7: 1-17 
The story in 2 Samuel 7 is set in the time after David has brought relative peace to his kingdom. In his earlier reign, David was in conflict with various enemies who sought to enslave or obliterate the Children of Israel. Now the land is at peace, and David begins to think about what should come next. He is sitting with Nathan, well known as a prophet. (Note that prophets in the Old Testament are known as “the mouth of God”.) 
 
David floats an idea that has been brewing in his mind. Now that his own throne is secure and he is at peace in his palace, he would like to build a house for God, a temple to the Lord. At first, Nathan says, “Go for it!” Then God speaks to Nathan, and Nathan acts out his role as one who speaks for God. God says, “Do you think I need a house? I don’t need a house. You are the one who needs something, and I will give it to you. I will establish your son on your throne, and he is the one who will build a house for me.” 
 
In 1 Chronicles 17, we have a parallel passage that tells essentially this same story, and then in 1 Chronicles 22, David gathers the materials necessary for Solomon to build the Temple. It is in that chapter that we are given a reason that Solomon and not David should build the Temple – that David was a man of war and had blood on his hands, while Solomon was a man of peace (witness his name: Solomon, derived from the word “Shalom”, or peace). But that explanation does not appear in our text. What does? 
 
Our text suggests something else: That God must first establish (build) David’s house before David builds God’s house. The point is simple: “Unless the Lord builds the house, they labour in vain who build it” (Psalm 127: 1). Genesis 11 and 12 make the same point. In Genesis 11, the people say, “Let us build ourselves a city and a tower … Let us make a name for ourselves.” God rebuked their efforts, because they left God out of their plans. Then, in chapter 12, God says, “I will make you a great nation [I will build you], and I will bless you, and I will make your name great.” Human efforts to do anything must follow God’s plans to work in our lives. David needed to step back and wait for God to work, so that he could join in what God wanted to do. 
 
Ephesians 2: 11-22 
Our second passage makes it clear what God wants to do. The first ten verses of the chapter describe God’s gift of life – “By grace you have been saved through faith”. Our text describes that gift of life more fully. 
 
Paul describes two groups of people, the “circumcised” and the “uncircumcised” – that is, Jews and Gentiles. Jews were “close to God” through the old covenant, which reminds his readers of the whole story of the Old Testament. Gentiles were “far way from God”, because, as Jesus puts it to the woman at the well, “salvation comes through the Jews” (John 4: 22). 
 
Now someone might think that the Gentiles’ condition excludes them from God’s presence. Indeed, the Jews of Paul’s day looked down on Gentiles. The barrier between Jew and Gentile was perhaps the strongest barrier in the New Testament world, but Paul makes clear what is really going on. God came through the Jews not just for the Jewish people, but for the Gentiles as well. Christ has broken down “the dividing wall of hostility” to make one new group of people that we call “Christians”. This was, if you will, the original “All Peoples’ Church”. Everyone was welcome! 
 
The way Paul puts it is important: “So he came and proclaimed peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near; for through him both of us have access in one Spirit to the Father. So then you are no longer strangers and aliens, but you are citizens with the saints and also members of the household of God, built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, with Christ Jesus himself as the cornerstone.” (2: 17-20) The essence of God’s salvation is peace, restored relationships between us and God and restored relationships between people. The dividing wall of hostility describes this world; “Peace” describes life in God. 
 
Working it Out 
I teach world religions at Providence, and I have been to the mosque in Winnipeg many times. Islam has a basic problem in that it honours Jesus only as a prophet. Muslims cannot say that Jesus is “the Son of God” and they would find it difficult to talk about Jesus the way that this passage does. At the same time, Islam has an important insight about how we relate to God. 
 
Islam divides the world into two groups of people – Dar al Islam and Dar al Harb. Dar al Islam means “House of those who submit” (Muslims are “people who submit” to God); Dar al Harb means “House of those who are at war” (infidels are “people at war with God”). Now surely this is an accurate depiction in Christian terms also. The world outside of God is filled with people who are at war with God and with each other. 
 
Listen to the news and see how we live in a world at war with itself. This week there were riots in South Africa, especially in Durban and KwaZulu-Natal. Our own country struggles with the relationship between Canada’s indigenous people and those of us who now live in the land. Our neighbour to the south is consumed with the debate over vaccines, with people on both sides convinced that the other side is trying to destroy them. We are even at war with the planet itself, as we face heat waves in the northwest of North America, floods in Europe, and drought on the Western plains of Canada. We are indeed a world at war. 
 
Paul suggests that the road to peace is found in the person of Jesus Christ. If we want to become Dar al Salam (the house of peace), we must become Dar al Islam (the house of those who submit to God). The true path to this peace is faith in Jesus Christ, who saves us by his grace. 
 
Synthesis 
Let’s bring these two passages together.
        1) David wanted to build a house for God. God said, “First, I will establish you. You need to get with my program if you want to worship me.” 
        2) Paul shows us how God wants to establish us and what God’s program is.
        3) God’s program is comprehensive – the healing of all the problems in our world, beginning with the church, that is, starting here with you and me. 
 
Together, then, these passages tell us that, if you want to worship God fully – if you want to build a house for God, you begin by seeking peace with God and asking God to build that full salvation and peace in your life and mine.  
 
Application 
What does that look like in our world? I find it interesting that this wonderful passage in Ephesians 2 follows immediately on the reminder that salvation is by grace through faith. Our first step is always to recognize that God does what needs to be done. We just join in. David wanted to build a house, and God said, “Wait for me to do the building.” We want to save the world, and God says, “Only I can save the world.” 
 
Our first step, then, is always a step into prayer and worship. As we are doing this morning, we come into God’s presence and honour and adore God. We do that in many different ways. Some people like loud fast-paced music; other prefer simple and reflective chants. Some people like prayer services where everyone is calling out to God together in a cacophony of sound; others prefer silence. Some people find God in the city; others find God by water and trees. The specific ways we worship are not as important as this basic fact: We come into God’s presence. If you have not met God in Christ, there is a basic hole in your life that only God can fill. 
 
Worship always leads to action, and action continues our worship. As we meet God in prayer, we may realise that God wants us to do something specific – something that breaks down barriers between people, something that reaches into a world at war with itself and holds out God’s peace. That action of seeking peace where people are at war is an act of worship. 
 
Remember that this peace, God’s peace, is comprehensive. It includes peace between Democrats and Republicans in the USA and peace between Wab Kinew and Pallister in Manitoba. It includes peace between Americans and Canadians divided by Covid-19. It includes even peace between the people who live here and the land in which we live. As Paul puts it in Romans 8, “For the creation waits with eager longing for the revealing of the children of God; … in hope that the creation itself will be set free from its bondage to decay and will obtain the freedom of the glory of the children of God.” God’s peace and salvation is for every person and indeed for the whole earth. 
 
This means that our worship leads us to seek peace and reconciliation on every side. When the medical people in the hospital work to reduce the effects of Covid-19, if they are Christians, their work is their worship for God. When a business manager seeks good relationships between management and employees, if he/she is a Christian, their work is their worship to God. When a neighbour brings a conflict between neighbours to an end and “makes peace”, if she is a Christian, if he is a Christian, their action is their worship for God. 
 
I think of an example from Christian environmentalism. In a book titled Kingfisher’s Fire: A story of hope for God’s earth, Peter Harris describes the founding of an organisation called A Rocha. A Rocha is present in Manitoba also, with a centre near East Braintree. Check it out sometime on your way here! 
 
In his book describing the beginnings of A Rocha in Portugal (A Rocha means “The Rock” in Portuguese), Harris describes how they also found themselves planting a church in Portugal, because their environmental work was an expression of their love for and worship of God. They have listened to God’s voice establishing them in the world, and A Rocha is the result. 
 
One of their projects was in the Bekaa Valley in the country of Lebanon. They were working in a war zone trying to save wetlands, which were basic to the survival of migrating birds. Although this project took place in a war zone, God has blessed it with remarkable success. Their work has been their worship. 
 
You and Me 
What does all this mean for you and me? David got something very right in the Old Testament reading. Once he was able to sit down and rest, he started asking, “What can I do for God?” God told him to rest some more and wait for God to work, but David’s impulse was right. I can give you a homework assignment. Ask God what God is doing! 
 
As you worship here in the church, as you pray and worship God at home, as God speaks to you in your work and in your play, listen for God’s voice. Then make your worship complete by joining in what God is doing. We live in a world at war with itself. God comes into our world and brings peace and reconciliation. God has made us “ministers and messengers of reconciliation (2 Corinthians 5). 
 
Your homework is to listen for what God is doing and then to join in. If you don’t do this, your worship here is incomplete and God is not pleased with it. If you do join in? Well:
Now in Christ Jesus you who once were far off have been brought near by the blood of Christ. 14 For he is our peace; in his flesh he has made both groups into one and has broken down the dividing wall, that is, the hostility between us. 15 He has abolished the law with its commandments and ordinances, that he might create in himself one new humanity in place of the two, thus making peace, 16 and might reconcile both groups to God in one body through the cross, thus putting to death that hostility through it. 17 So he came and proclaimed peace to you who were far off and peace to those who were near; 18 for through him we all have access in one Spirit to the Father.
 
If you do join in? You are part of the salvation of the world! 
 
 
 
18 July 2021 
All Nations People’s Church 
 
Texts 
2 Samuel 7: 1-17 
David wants to build a “house of cedar” for God. God says, “I will establish your house instead, and your son will build a house for me.” 
The order of things is important here: First, God builds-establishes; then we build-establish. Compare to Genesis 11 (Let us make a name for ourselves) and 12 (I will make your name great). We face the constant temptation to do God’s work for God (acting as though we can take God’s place), instead of joining in and participating in God’s work. 
 
Ephesians 2: 11-22 
God builds one new humanity out of the various warring factions in our world. This is the “house of God”, and this was God’s purpose from the beginning – to reconcile the world to God and the people of the world to each other (cf 2 Cor 5). This great work is central to the name of this congregation: “All People’s Church”. This work is based on the work of Jesus (dying and rising) and of the Holy Spirit (filling and empowering).